Re: linux/bitops.h

[Sasha Levin]

On 05/04/2016 08:48 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> That said, the fact that the other cases weren't changed
> (rol64/ror64/ror32) does make that argument less interesting. Unless
> there was some particular code that actively ended up using
> "rol32(..0)" but not the other cases.

Right, the others seemed wrong as well but I couldn't find any code
that triggers that, and preferred to fix just the one I was hitting.

I can go fix the rest if that's something we want to do?


Thanks,
Sasha