Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: make it working again

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:13:59AM +0100, MÃns RullgÃrd wrote:
>> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 04:00:08PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> >>> Hello, Andy.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:22:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> >>> > Tejun, since Vinod applied all necessary patches into his tree, the
>> >>> > series now has just a dependency to whatever branch / tag he marks for
>> >>> > it.
>> >>> > Do we have a chance to see the SATA series be applied in your tree?
>> >>>
>> >>> Applied 1-22 to libata/for-4.7.  There was a couple trivial conflicts
>> >>> which I resolved while applying but it'd be great if you can check
>> >>> whether everything looks okay.
>> >>>
>> >>>  https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tj/libata.git/log/?h=for-4.7
>> >>
>> >> Oops, build failure.  Reverted for now.
>> >
>> > I suppose you have to pull material from Vinod.
>>
>> The failure the build bot reported is due to the DMA patches not being
>> in the tree.
>
> Which tree should I pull?

slave-dma [1], branch topic/dw. But I think Vinod can tell us which
tag/branch will be immutable. Vinod?

[1] http://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma.git

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko