Re: [PATCH 4/7] [media] ir-rx51: add DT support to driver

From: Ivaylo Dimitrov
Date: Mon May 09 2016 - 18:06:31 EST




On 10.05.2016 00:07, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Ivaylo Dimitrov
<ivo.g.dimitrov.75@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

On 9.05.2016 23:06, Rob Herring wrote:

On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 06:21:45PM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:

With the upcoming removal of legacy boot, lets add support to one of the
last N900 drivers remaining without it. As the driver still uses omap
dmtimer, add auxdata as well.

Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@xxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/media/nokia,lirc-rx51 | 19
+++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c | 6 +-----
drivers/media/rc/ir-rx51.c | 11 ++++++++++-
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nokia,lirc-rx51

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nokia,lirc-rx51
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nokia,lirc-rx51
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5b3081e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nokia,lirc-rx51
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Device-Tree bindings for LIRC TX driver for Nokia N900(RX51)
+
+Required properties:
+ - compatible: should be "nokia,lirc-rx51".


lirc is a Linux term. Also, nokia,rx51-... would be conventional
ordering.


I used the driver name ("lirc_rx51") to not bring confusion. Also, it
registers itself through lirc_register_driver() call, so having lirc in its
name somehow makes sense.

I am not very good in inventing names, the best compatible I can think of is
"nokia,rx51-ir". Is that ok?

Sure, but...

Is this anything more than a PWM LED?


It is an IR LED connected through a driver to McSPI2_SIMO pin of OMAP3,
which pin can be configured as PWM or GPIO(there are other configurations,
but they don't make sense). In theory it could be used for various things
(like uni-directional serial TX, or stuff like that), but in practice it
allows N900 to be act as an IR remote controller. I guess that fits in
"nothing more than a PWM LED", more or less.

There's already a pwm-led binding that can be used. Though there may
be missing consumer IR to LED subsystem support in the kernel. You
could list both compatibles, use the rx51 IR driver now, and then move
to pwm-led driver in the future.


I looked at the pwm-leds (and related) code and couldn't see how it will do the job of controlling IR TX LED as a remote controller. So yeah, it seems CIR support in LEDS subsystem is non existent.

Could you elaborate on "list both compatibles", I don't really understand what I should do.

Ivo