Re: [PATCH v2] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event.

[Robert Foss]

Thanks Eric!

On 2016-05-10 01:06 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On 2016-05-03 03:22 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> > >
> > > > From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return
> > > > -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier
> > > > update pending.
> > > >
> > > > Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is:
> > > >
> > > >       *  - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and there is
> > > >       *    an earlier updated pending. Drivers are allowed to support a queue
> > > >       *    of outstanding updates, but currently no driver supports that.
> > > >       *    Note that drivers must wait for preceding updates to complete if a
> > > >       *    synchronous update is requested, they are not allowed to fail the
> > > >       *    commit in that case.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > This looks good to me.  Let's give it a few days on the list for any
> > > other KMS folks to catch anything.
> >
> > I haven't seen any further feedback regarding this patch.
> > Does anyone have objections to it being merged?
>
> I merged it to drm-vc4-next last night, actually :)