Re: Getting rid of dynamic TASK_SIZE (on x86, at least)

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 02:11:41PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
 >
> > For sure page faulting must consider what kind of fault is it.
> > Or we gonna drop such code at all?
> 
> That code was bogus.  (Well, it was correct unless user code had a way
> to create a funny high mapping in an otherwise 32-bit task, but it
> still should have been TASK_SIZE_MAX.)  Fix sent.

OK, great!