Re: [PATCH] Cleanup __pvclock_read_cycles to remove useless variables

[Minfei Huang]

On 05/11/16 at 04:24P, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 30/04/2016 23:57, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> > Should we kill __pvclock_read_cycles in favor of vread_pvclock? It looks
> >> > doable at a quick scan...
> >> >
> > The in-kernel version might have to be a bit different because it
> > needs to handle the !stable case.  If !stable, it should just use the
> > current CPU's copy which means that, realistically, it should just
> > get_cpu and use the local copy unconditionally.  Other than that, it
> > could look a lot like the vread_pvclock variant.
> > 
> > But I agree, the current thing is incomprehensible.
> 
> It also lacks smp_rmb()s.  One is more or less implicit in rdtsc, but
> you need one to separate __pvclock_read_cycles's reads of src->foo from
> pvclock_read_flags's read of src->version.
> 
> Minfei, would you like to take a look?

Sure. I will take a look about this issue.

Thanks
Minfei

> 
> Paolo