Re: [PATCH v2] locking/rwsem: Add reader-owned state to the owner field

[Waiman Long]

On 05/12/2016 05:27 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > > Arguably, this check should be bumped out to the optimistic spin and
> > > reload/check the owner there?
> > >
> > > Or better yet; don't pass the owner in as a parameter at all, but
> > > instead snapshot the owner and check its ownership on entry.
> > That will make the main optimistic spinning loop more complex.
> ??
>
> Simpler.
>
> 	while (rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem)) {
> 		if (rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(sem)) {
> 			taken = true;
> 			break;
> 		}
>
> 		if (!sem->owner&&  (need_resched() || rt_task(current)))
> 			break;
>
> 		cpu_relax_lowlatency();
> 	}
>
>
>
>
> bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
> 	struct task_struct *owner = READ_ONCE(sem->owner);
>
> 	if (!rwsem_is_writer_owned(owner))
> 		return false;
>
> 	rcu_read_lock();
> 	while (sem->owner == owner) {
> 		....
> 	}
> 	rcu_read_unlock();
> 	
> 	return !rwsem_is_reader_owned(sem->owner);
> }

I have been thinking about something like that, but my inclination is to 
make as few changes as possible to the existing patch. I did add a new 
patch to streamline the code as suggested.

Cheers,
Longman