Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399

From: Doug Anderson
Date: Mon May 16 2016 - 16:17:51 EST


Hi,

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:57 AM, David Wu <david.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There are three points differert from others:
> - new method to caculate i2c timings for rk3399
> - pclk and function clk are separated at rk3399
> - add fast-plus mode supported for rk3399
>
> David Wu (8):
> i2c: rk3x: add documentation to fields in "struct rk3x_i2c"
> i2c: rk3x: use struct "rk3x_i2c_calced_timings"
> i2c: rk3x: Remove redundant rk3x_i2c_clean_ipd()
> i2c: rk3x: Change SoC data to not use array
> i2c: rk3x: Move spec timing data to "static const" structs
> dt-bindings: i2c: rk3x: add support for rk3399
> i2c: rk3x: add i2c support for rk3399 soc
> i2c: rk3x: support fast-mode plus for rk3399
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt | 16 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c | 498 +++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 434 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)

I haven't put these on the scope or anything, but I have:

* Tested that my i2c busses on rk3288-veyron still seem to work OK
after these patches.

* Tested that my i2c busses on an rk3399 board seem to work after
these patches (plus device tree changes).

Thus, for the series:

Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

...possibly could leave off the Tested-by tag for the last in the
series since I have no Fast Mode Plus devices to test against. ;)

-Doug