Re: [PATCH] Use MICRO UINT_MAX instead of actual value

From: Guilherme G. Piccoli
Date: Mon May 16 2016 - 18:30:42 EST


On 04/30/2016 07:13 AM, Minfei Huang wrote:
Ping.

Any comment is appreciate.

Hi Minfei, I guess a good idea would be to resend the patch with the typo fixed, as a v2 patch. What do you think?

Cheers,


Guilherme


Thanks
Minfei

On 04/25/16 at 11:13P, Minfei Huang wrote:
It's more elegant to use MICRO UINT_MAX to represent the max value of
type unsigned int. So replace the actual value by using this MICRO.

Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnghuan@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 643f457..2c0bb13 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct nvme_ns *ns)

ns->queue->limits.discard_alignment = logical_block_size;
ns->queue->limits.discard_granularity = logical_block_size;
- blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(ns->queue, 0xffffffff);
+ blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(ns->queue, UINT_MAX);
queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, ns->queue);
}

--
2.6.3


_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme