Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] of: unittest: Unit-tests for target root overlays.

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
<pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add unittests for target-root based overlays.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts      |   5 +
>  drivers/of/unittest-data/tests-overlay.dtsi |  48 +++++++
>  drivers/of/unittest.c                       | 213 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 266 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts
> index 74e8805..a6ded1b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts
> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts
> @@ -80,5 +80,10 @@
>                                 target = <0x00000000 0x00000004>;
>                         };
>                 };
> +               overlay18 {
> +                       fragment@0 {

Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node .../fragment@0 has a unit name,
but no reg property

(I didn't really run dtc, just copying a warning message from somewhere else)

> +                               target = <0x00000000>;
> +                       };
> +               };
>         };

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds