Re: [PATCH 4.4 07/73] soreuseport: fix ordering for mixed v4/v6 sockets
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue May 17 2016 - 10:39:50 EST
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:36:29AM -0400, Craig Gallek wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> I don't believe the changes that this patch fixes are in the 4.4 tree.
> Please correct me if I'm wrong...
Hm, I don't know, David, is this included incorrectly in 4.4-stable?
thanks,
greg k-h
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Craig Gallek <kraig@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit d894ba18d4e449b3a7f6eb491f16c9e02933736e ]
> >
> > With the SO_REUSEPORT socket option, it is possible to create sockets
> > in the AF_INET and AF_INET6 domains which are bound to the same IPv4 address.
> > This is only possible with SO_REUSEPORT and when not using IPV6_V6ONLY on
> > the AF_INET6 sockets.
> >
> > Prior to the commits referenced below, an incoming IPv4 packet would
> > always be routed to a socket of type AF_INET when this mixed-mode was used.
> > After those changes, the same packet would be routed to the most recently
> > bound socket (if this happened to be an AF_INET6 socket, it would
> > have an IPv4 mapped IPv6 address).
> >
> > The change in behavior occurred because the recent SO_REUSEPORT optimizations
> > short-circuit the socket scoring logic as soon as they find a match. They
> > did not take into account the scoring logic that favors AF_INET sockets
> > over AF_INET6 sockets in the event of a tie.
> >
> > To fix this problem, this patch changes the insertion order of AF_INET
> > and AF_INET6 addresses in the TCP and UDP socket lists when the sockets
> > have SO_REUSEPORT set. AF_INET sockets will be inserted at the head of the
> > list and AF_INET6 sockets with SO_REUSEPORT set will always be inserted at
> > the tail of the list. This will force AF_INET sockets to always be
> > considered first.
> >
> > Fixes: e32ea7e74727 ("soreuseport: fast reuseport UDP socket selection")
> > Fixes: 125e80b88687 ("soreuseport: fast reuseport TCP socket selection")
> >
> > Reported-by: Maciej Åenczykowski <maze@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Craig Gallek <kraig@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/rculist_nulls.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/net/sock.h | 6 +++++-
> > net/ipv4/udp.c | 9 +++++++--
> > 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
> > @@ -98,6 +98,45 @@ static inline void hlist_nulls_add_head_
> > if (!is_a_nulls(first))
> > first->pprev = &n->next;
> > }
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu
> > + * @n: the element to add to the hash list.
> > + * @h: the list to add to.
> > + *
> > + * Description:
> > + * Adds the specified element to the end of the specified hlist_nulls,
> > + * while permitting racing traversals. NOTE: tail insertion requires
> > + * list traversal.
> > + *
> > + * The caller must take whatever precautions are necessary
> > + * (such as holding appropriate locks) to avoid racing
> > + * with another list-mutation primitive, such as hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu()
> > + * or hlist_nulls_del_rcu(), running on this same list.
> > + * However, it is perfectly legal to run concurrently with
> > + * the _rcu list-traversal primitives, such as
> > + * hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(), used to prevent memory-consistency
> > + * problems on Alpha CPUs. Regardless of the type of CPU, the
> > + * list-traversal primitive must be guarded by rcu_read_lock().
> > + */
> > +static inline void hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu(struct hlist_nulls_node *n,
> > + struct hlist_nulls_head *h)
> > +{
> > + struct hlist_nulls_node *i, *last = NULL;
> > +
> > + for (i = hlist_nulls_first_rcu(h); !is_a_nulls(i);
> > + i = hlist_nulls_next_rcu(i))
> > + last = i;
> > +
> > + if (last) {
> > + n->next = last->next;
> > + n->pprev = &last->next;
> > + rcu_assign_pointer(hlist_nulls_next_rcu(last), n);
> > + } else {
> > + hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(n, h);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu - iterate over rcu list of given type
> > * @tpos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
> > --- a/include/net/sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> > @@ -649,7 +649,11 @@ static inline void sk_add_node_rcu(struc
> >
> > static inline void __sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(struct sock *sk, struct hlist_nulls_head *list)
> > {
> > - hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&sk->sk_nulls_node, list);
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && sk->sk_reuseport &&
> > + sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
> > + hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu(&sk->sk_nulls_node, list);
> > + else
> > + hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&sk->sk_nulls_node, list);
> > }
> >
> > static inline void sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(struct sock *sk, struct hlist_nulls_head *list)
> > --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> > @@ -296,8 +296,13 @@ found:
> >
> > hslot2 = udp_hashslot2(udptable, udp_sk(sk)->udp_portaddr_hash);
> > spin_lock(&hslot2->lock);
> > - hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&udp_sk(sk)->udp_portaddr_node,
> > - &hslot2->head);
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && sk->sk_reuseport &&
> > + sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
> > + hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu(&udp_sk(sk)->udp_portaddr_node,
> > + &hslot2->head);
> > + else
> > + hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&udp_sk(sk)->udp_portaddr_node,
> > + &hslot2->head);
> > hslot2->count++;
> > spin_unlock(&hslot2->lock);
> > }
> >
> >