Re: [PATCH] devfreq: fix double call put_device
From: Chanwoo Choi
Date: Wed May 18 2016 - 07:07:15 EST
Hi Cai,
On 2016ë 05ì 14ì 15:28, Caizhiyong wrote:
> From: Cai Zhiyong <caizhiyong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 14:13:30 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] devfreq: fix double call put_device
The patch description don't need to include the 'Date/Subject'.
You need to delete them.
>
> 1295 */
> 1296 void device_unregister(struct device *dev)
> 1297 {
> 1298 pr_debug("device: '%s': %s\n", dev_name(dev), __func__);
> 1299 device_del(dev);
> 1300 put_device(dev);
> 1301 }
> 1302 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_unregister);
> 1303
Also, you don't need to include the source code of device_unregister()
because below description explains the why this patch is needed.
>
> device_unregister is called put_device, there is no need to call
> put_device(&devfreq->dev) again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cai Zhiyong <caizhiyong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> index 1d6c803..8de22c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> @@ -621,7 +621,6 @@ int devfreq_remove_device(struct devfreq *devfreq)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> device_unregister(&devfreq->dev);
> - put_device(&devfreq->dev);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
If you modify the patch description, Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi