Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/fpu/state: Fix XSAVES issues - Part 1

[Ingo Molnar]

* Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:12:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Hm, the series does not apply cleanly:
> > 
> >  patching file arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h
> >  patching file arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> >  patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
> >  patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c
> >  patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> >  Hunk #4 FAILED at 552.
> >  1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> > 
> > which suggests that this series isn't against a recent x86 tree, right?
> 
> That was based on the latest upstream kernel.  I also keep a version based
> on tip/master.  Would it work?

Yes, tip/master would be fine, or upstream bc231d9ede99 that has the x86 tree 
already merged.

Thanks,

	Ingo.