RE: [PATCH v8 13/14] usb: gadget: udc: adapt to OTG core

[Jun Li]

Hi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Quadros [mailto:rogerq@xxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 6:12 PM
> To: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jun Li <jun.li@xxxxxxx>; peter.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; balbi@xxxxxxxxxx;
> tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx;
> mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Joao.Pinto@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jun.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx; yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> robh@xxxxxxxxxx; nsekhar@xxxxxx; b-liu@xxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/14] usb: gadget: udc: adapt to OTG core
> 
> On 23/05/16 06:21, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:29:40AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:32:44AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>> On 18/05/16 17:46, Jun Li wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I didn't want to have complex Kconfig so decided to have otg as
> >>>>>>> built-in only.
> >>>>>>> What do you want me to change in existing code? and why?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Remove those stuff which only for pass diff driver config Like
> >>>>>> every controller driver need a duplicated
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> static struct otg_hcd_ops ci_hcd_ops = {
> >>>>>>     ...
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is an exception only. Every controller driver doesn't need to
> >>>>> implement hcd_ops. It is implemented in the hcd core.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And here is another example, for gadget connect, otg driver can
> >>>>>> directly call to usb_udc_vbus_handler() in drd state machine, but
> >>>>>> you create another interface:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> .connect_control = usb_gadget_connect_control,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If the symbol is defined in one driver which is 'm', another
> >>>>>> driver reference it should be 'm' as well, then there is no this
> >>>>>> kind of problem as my understanding.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That is fine as long as all are 'm'. but how do you solve the case
> >>>>> when Gadget is built in and host is 'm'? OTG has to be built-in
> >>>>> and you will need an hcd to gadget interface.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hcd to gadget interface? Or you want to say otg to host interface?
> >>>
> >>> Sorry, I meant to say host to otg interface.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I think hcd and gadget are independent each other, now
> >>>>
> >>>> Hcd --> otg; and gadget --> otg, (hcd and gadget use otg's symbol)
> >>>
> >>> It is actually a circular dependency for both.
> >>>  hcd <--> otg and gadget <--> otg
> >>>
> >>> hcd -> otg for usb_otg_register/unregister_hcd otg -> hcd for
> >>> usb_add/remove_hcd, usb_bus_start_enum, usb_control_msg,
> >>> usb_hub_find_child
> >>>
> >>> gadget -> otg for usb_otg_register/unregister_gadget
> >>> otg -> gadget for usb_gadget_start/stop, usb_udc_vbus_handler
> >>>
> >>> Now consider what will happen if I get rid of the otg_hcd and
> otg_gadget interfaces.
> >>> 'y' means built-in, 'm' means module.
> >>>
> >>> 1) hcd 'y', gadget 'y'
> >>> otg has to be 'y' for proper build.
> >>>
> >>> 2) hcd 'm', gadget 'm'
> >>> otg has to be 'm' for proper build.
> >>>
> >>> 3) hcd 'y', gadget 'm'
> >>> Build will fail always.
> >>> If otg is 'y', otg build will fail due to dependency on gadget.
> >>> If otg is 'm', hcd build will fail due to dependency on otg.
> >>>
> >>> 4) hcd 'm', gadget 'y'
> >>> Build will fail always.
> >>> If otg is 'y', otg build will fail due to dependency on hcd.
> >>> If otg is 'm', gadget build will fails due to dependency on otg.
> >>>
> >>> So I solve this problem by adding the otg_hcd_ops and otg_gadget_ops
> >>> to remove otg->hcd and otg->gadget dependency.
> >>>
> >>> Now we can address 3) and 4) like so
> >>>
> >>> 3) hcd 'y', gadget 'm'
> >>> otg has to be 'y' for proper build.
> >>>
> >>> 4) hcd 'm', gadget 'y'
> >>> otg has to be 'y' for proper build.
> >>>
> >>
> >> How about this:
> >> Moving usb_otg_register/unregister_hcd to host driver to remove
> >> dependency hcd->otg. And moving usb_otg_get_data to common.c.
> >>
> >> Delete the wait queue at usb-otg.c, and if calling usb_otg_get_data
> >> returns NULL, the host/device driver's probe return -EPROBE_DEFER.
> >> When the otg driver is probed successfully, the host/device will be
> >> re-probed again, and usb_otg_register_hcd will be called again.
> >>
> >> And let OTG depends on HCD && GADGET, and delete otg_hcd_ops and
> >> otg_gadget_ops. Below build dependency issues can be fixed.
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >>> 1) hcd 'y', gadget 'y'
> >>> otg has to be 'y' for proper build.
> >>>
> >>> 2) hcd 'm', gadget 'm'
> >>> otg has to be 'm' for proper build.
> >>>
> >>> 3) hcd 'y', gadget 'm'
> >>> Build will fail always.
> >>> If otg is 'y', otg build will fail due to dependency on gadget.
> >>> If otg is 'm', hcd build will fail due to dependency on otg.
> >>>
> >>> 4) hcd 'm', gadget 'y'
> >>> Build will fail always.
> >>> If otg is 'y', otg build will fail due to dependency on hcd.
> >>> If otg is 'm', gadget build will fails due to dependency on otg.
> >> --
> >>
> >
> > After thinking more, my suggestion can't work. How about moving
> > CONFIG_USB_OTG out of CONFIG_USB, in that case, CONFIG_USB_OTG can
> > only be built in.
> >
> I tried this but it still doesn't resolve 3 and 4. I.e.
> it can't be automatically set to 'y' when either of hcd/gadget is 'y'
> and the other is 'm'.

USB_OTG only can be selected by *user*, can't be automatically set to
'y' like you said, no matter what's hcd/gadget config, USB_OTG can be
disabled in any cases.

I think Peter's intention is to make USB_OTG to be 'bool', either disabled;
or built-in(if enabled), something like your original idea?

Li Jun

> 
> I think some kconfig trickery can be done to get what we want.
> 
> cheers,
> -roger