Re: [PATCH] devicetree - document using aliases to set spi bus number.
From: Christer Weinigel
Date: Tue May 24 2016 - 14:57:15 EST
On 05/24/2016 08:32 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:03:48PM +0200, Christer Weinigel wrote:
>> On 05/24/2016 07:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> I'm not sure this is something we want to support at all, I
>>> can't immediately see anything that does this deliberately in
>>> the SPI code and obviously the "bus number" is something of a
>>> Linux specific concept which would need some explanation if we
>>> were going to document it. It's something I'm struggling a bit
>>> to see a robust use case for that isn't better served by
>>> parsing sysfs, what's the goal here?
>
>> If this isn't something that should be in the
>> Documentation/devicetree because it's not generig enough, where
>> should Linux-specific interpretations such as this be
>> documented?
>
> I'm not clear that we want to document this at all since I am not
> clear that there is a sensible use case for doing it. I did ask
> for one but you've not articulated one in this reply. I am much
> less gung ho than Grant on this one, even as a Linux specific
> interface it seems very legacy.
It's bloody convenient. I'm working with a Zync board right now where
we have multiple SPI ports. Being able to label the ports on the
board spi1, spi2 and spi3 and having spidev devices show up as
/dev/spidev1.0 instead of dynamic assignment makes things much easier.
Especially when doing driver development where unloading and
reloading the spi driver module will give it a new dynamic number
every time.
Yes, it's possible to iterate through all files /sys/class/spi_master
and then have a table to map those names to device names and create
symlinks to them, it's just painful. It's much easier to do be able
to do "cat data >/dev/spidev1.0" from busybox and not have to set up
all that infrastructure. And yes, this is on an embedded system using
busybox without udev.
In addition, right now I have a couple of different variants of the
boards that I work on, and with different SPI ports at different
addresses. It's rather nice to be able to reuse the same kernel +
ramdisk on multiple variants and only have to update the devicetree to
get sensible devices names on all variants.
/Christer