Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf pt: Mark PT return events as "return"

[Adrian Hunter]

On 24/05/2016 10:05 p.m., Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > What about beautifying the sample flags i.e. instead of displaying the
> > > letters interpret them into something more human readable e.g.
> >
> > Looks like a good idea, but can't this be done on top of what he sent?
>
> Yes it both makes sense together.

OK I will look at the patch tomorrow.

It looks like it synths 2 samples for each return (one "branches" and
one "return"), which I would expect would mess up the thread_stack pairing
calls and returns.  Did you intend to have 2 samples?