RE: [PATCH] x86, signals: add missing signal_compat code for x86 features
From: Luck, Tony
Date: Tue May 24 2016 - 18:49:18 EST
> Tony / Borislav, do we have tests for the machine check code that could
> have caught this?
If I had built one of my recovery test programs as a 32-byte binary instead of native 64-bit I might have noticed (I only print the lsb field ... which would have been garbage on the stack, maybe I'd have spotted a silly value).