Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: Add async-bridge clock to MFC power domain for Exynos5420
From: Javier Martinez Canillas
Date: Wed May 25 2016 - 10:22:20 EST
Hello Krzysztof,
On 05/25/2016 03:48 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/24/2016 07:41 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The MFC IP is also inter-connected by an Async-Bridge so the CLK_ACLK333
>> has to be ungated during a power domain switch. Trying to do it when the
>> clock is gated will fail and lead to an imprecise external abort error
>> when the driver tries to access the MFC registers with the PD disabled.
>>
>> For example, if the s5p-mfc module is removed and the MFC PD turned off:
>>
>> [ 186.835606] Power domain power-domain@10044060 disable failed
>> [ 186.835671] s5p-mfc 11000000.codec: Removing 11000000.codec
>> [ 186.837670] Power domain power-domain@10044060 disable failed
>>
>> And when the module is inserted again:
>>
>> [ 2395.176956] s5p_mfc_wait_for_done_dev:34: Interrupt (dev->int_type:0, command:12) timed out
>> [ 2395.177031] s5p_mfc_init_hw:272: Failed to load firmware
>> [ 2395.177384] Unhandled fault: imprecise external abort (0x1406) at 0x00000000
>> [ 2395.177441] pgd = ec3b4000
>> [ 2395.177467] [00000000] *pgd=00000000
>> [ 2395.177507] Internal error: : 1406 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
>> [ 2395.177550] Modules linked in: s5p_mfc mwifiex_sdio mwifiex uvcvideo s5p_jpeg v4l2_mem2mem videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_dma_contig videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_core v4l2_common videodev media [last unloaded: s5p_mfc]
>> [ 2395.177774] CPU: 1 PID: 2382 Comm: v4l_id Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc6-next-20160502-00010-g7730dc64d2c1-dirty #179
>> [ 2395.177857] Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
>> [ 2395.177906] task: ed275500 ti: e6c8c000 task.ti: e6c8c000
>> [ 2395.177996] PC is at s5p_mfc_reset+0x1c4/0x284 [s5p_mfc]
>> [ 2395.178057] LR is at s5p_mfc_reset+0x1a4/0x284 [s5p_mfc]
>>
>> This patch fixes this issue by adding the CLK_ACLK333 as an Async-Bridge
>> clock for the MFC power domain, so the PD configuration works properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Indeed patch #1 is not a hard dependency here because there are no other
> asb clocks. It is entirely obvious but works fine.
>
You are right, the reason why is not a hard dependency is because it fails
anyways so this patch (which will make it fail due the clock being missed)
won't have any effect.
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
Thanks!
> Unless all other patches are meant to current fixes cycle (and/or
> cc-stable), I do not plan to apply it now. I'll take it for v4.8, because:
> 1. Your previous patches are needed. Without them bind/unbind won't work.
> 2. This is not reproducible in a regular driver operation.
> 3. It needs clock change to actually be useful.
>
> Is it okay?
>
Agreed, that's also why I didn't cc stable on this series.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America