Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix setting AP channel with new firmwares

[RafaÅ MiÅecki]

On 25 May 2016 at 23:08, Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 24-05-16 11:09, RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote:
>> Firmware for new chipsets is based on a new major version of code
>> internally maintained at Broadcom. E.g. brcmfmac4366b-pcie.bin (used for
>> BCM4366B1) is based on 10.10.69.3309 while brcmfmac43602-pcie.ap.bin was
>> based on 7.35.177.56.
>>
>> Currently setting AP 5 GHz channel doesn't work reliably with BCM4366B1.
>> When setting e.g. 36 control channel with VHT80 (center channel 42)
>> firmware may randomly pick one of:
>> 1) 52 control channel with 58 as center one
>> 2) 100 control channel with 106 as center one
>> 3) 116 control channel with 122 as center one
>> 4) 149 control channel with 155 as center one
>>
>> It seems new firmwares require setting AP mode (BRCMF_C_SET_AP) before
>> specifying a channel. Changing an order of firmware calls fixes the
>> problem.
>>
>> This fix was verified with BCM4366B1 and tested for regressions on
>> BCM43602. It's unclear if it's needed (or correct at all) for P2P
>> interfaces so it leaves this code unaffected.
>
> In doing so the code reads a bit awkward so if P2P-GO works with the
> changed order that would be preferable.

I'd prefer to have one code path as well, but my device/firmware
doesn't support P2P so I couldn't test it.

Could you test it or check firmware code to see if it's safe to change
P2P path as well?

-- 
RafaÅ