Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64/numa: fix type info
From: Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Date: Thu May 26 2016 - 22:36:33 EST
On 2016/5/27 1:12, David Daney wrote:
> The current patch to correct this problem is here:
> Since v7 of the ACPI/NUMA patches are likely going to be added to linux-next as soon as the current merge window ends, further simplifications of the informational prints should probably be rebased on top of it.
> David Daney
>> On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 09:22 -0700, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>> IIRC, it should be
>>> if (!numa_off)
>>> we want to print this message when we failed to find proper numa configuration.
>>> when numa_off is set, we will not look for any numa configuration.
>>>> + pr_info("%s\n", "No NUMA configuration found");
OK, I think I also missed some cases.
But my problem still have not been resolved by "https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/679", see below. I will update my patches base on it.
[ 0.000000] NUMA: Adding memblock [0x0 - 0x6affffff] on node 0
[ 0.000000] NUMA: parsing numa-distance-map-v1
[ 0.000000] NUMA: Warning: invalid memblk node 4 [mem 0x6b000000-0x7fbfffff] //My numa configuration is incorrect, but not "No ... found"
[ 0.000000] No NUMA configuration found //Above warning is very detail, this can be removed
[ 0.000000] NUMA: Faking a node at [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x00000017ffffffff]