Re: [PATCH 3/6] mm, oom_adj: make sure processes sharing mm have same view of oom_score_adj

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Fri May 27 2016 - 07:18:12 EST

Next message: Nick Alcock: "[4.1.x -- 4.6.x and probably HEAD] Reproducible unprivileged panic/TLB BUG on sparc via a stack-protected rt_sigaction() ka_restorer, courtesy of the glibc testsuite"
Previous message: Wolfram Sang: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c-dev: switch from register_chrdev to cdev API"
In reply to: Michal Hocko: "[PATCH 3/6] mm, oom_adj: make sure processes sharing mm have same view of oom_score_adj"
Next in thread: Vladimir Davydov: "Re: [PATCH 3/6] mm, oom_adj: make sure processes sharing mm have same view of oom_score_adj"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

And here again. Get rid of the mm_users check because it is not
reliable.
---

Next message: Nick Alcock: "[4.1.x -- 4.6.x and probably HEAD] Reproducible unprivileged panic/TLB BUG on sparc via a stack-protected rt_sigaction() ka_restorer, courtesy of the glibc testsuite"
Previous message: Wolfram Sang: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c-dev: switch from register_chrdev to cdev API"
In reply to: Michal Hocko: "[PATCH 3/6] mm, oom_adj: make sure processes sharing mm have same view of oom_score_adj"
Next in thread: Vladimir Davydov: "Re: [PATCH 3/6] mm, oom_adj: make sure processes sharing mm have same view of oom_score_adj"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]