Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/fair: Clean up attach_entity_load_avg()

[Yuyang Du]

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:34:02AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 06:32:54AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -2961,24 +2961,6 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se, int update_tg)
> >  
> >  static void attach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> >  {
> > -	if (!sched_feat(ATTACH_AGE_LOAD))
> > -		goto skip_aging;
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * If we got migrated (either between CPUs or between cgroups) we'll
> > -	 * have aged the average right before clearing @last_update_time.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (se->avg.last_update_time) {
> > -		__update_load_avg(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time, cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)),
> > -				  &se->avg, 0, 0, NULL);
> > -
> > -		/*
> > -		 * XXX: we could have just aged the entire load away if we've been
> > -		 * absent from the fair class for too long.
> > -		 */
> > -	}
> > -
> > -skip_aging:
> >  	se->avg.last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
> >  	cfs_rq->avg.load_avg += se->avg.load_avg;
> >  	cfs_rq->avg.load_sum += se->avg.load_sum;
> 
> So I'm not a big fan of this patch; the aging is a conceptual part of
> attaching the load, the fact that it only happens in one callsite is a
> mere 'accident'.

Strictly in concept, it is part of load dealing, maybe not load attaching, :)