Re: [RFT v3] drm: use late_initcall() for amdkfd and radeon
From: Luis R. Rodriguez
Date: Tue May 31 2016 - 13:16:04 EST
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 05:49:17PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
> > index b55aa740171f..1fa1b7f3a89c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
> > @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static void __exit radeon_exit(void)
> > radeon_unregister_atpx_handler();
> > }
> >
> > -module_init(radeon_init);
> > +late_initcall(radeon_init);
> > module_exit(radeon_exit);
>
> Need to modify also amdgpu module_init
Thanks, so other than considering the first two hunks are only for testing purposes
(a proper [PATCH] will drop these hunks on the Makefile), you're suggestng this
then, is that right?:
---
drivers/Makefile | 6 ++----
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/Makefile b/drivers/Makefile
index 0b6f3d60193d..0fbe3982041f 100644
--- a/drivers/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/Makefile
@@ -50,10 +50,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER) += reset/
obj-y += tty/
obj-y += char/
-# iommu/ comes before gpu as gpu are using iommu controllers
-obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT) += iommu/
-
-# gpu/ comes after char for AGP vs DRM startup and after iommu
+# gpu/ comes after char for AGP vs DRM startup
obj-y += gpu/
obj-$(CONFIG_CONNECTOR) += connector/
@@ -147,6 +144,7 @@ obj-y += clk/
obj-$(CONFIG_MAILBOX) += mailbox/
obj-$(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK) += hwspinlock/
+obj-$(CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT) += iommu/
obj-$(CONFIG_REMOTEPROC) += remoteproc/
obj-$(CONFIG_RPMSG) += rpmsg/
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
index 1dab5f2b725b..1ca448f2b4d2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static void __exit amdgpu_exit(void)
amdgpu_sync_fini();
}
-module_init(amdgpu_init);
+late_initcall(amdgpu_init);
module_exit(amdgpu_exit);
MODULE_AUTHOR(DRIVER_AUTHOR);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
index 850a5623661f..3d1dab8a31c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static void __exit kfd_module_exit(void)
dev_info(kfd_device, "Removed module\n");
}
-module_init(kfd_module_init);
+late_initcall(kfd_module_init);
module_exit(kfd_module_exit);
MODULE_AUTHOR(KFD_DRIVER_AUTHOR);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
index b55aa740171f..1fa1b7f3a89c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static void __exit radeon_exit(void)
radeon_unregister_atpx_handler();
}
-module_init(radeon_init);
+late_initcall(radeon_init);
module_exit(radeon_exit);
MODULE_AUTHOR(DRIVER_AUTHOR);
--
2.8.2
> I tested this on Kaveri, and amdkfd is working. For amdkfd that's
> fine, but IMO that's not enough testing for radeon/amdgpu. I would
> like to hear AMD's developers take on this.
Sure. Hopefully the above extensions suffice. In the future we should be able
to also replace the radeon amdkfd -EPROBE_DEFER kludge and the implicit
sensitivity in Makefiles over GPU drivers and IOMMUs, but a bit more work is
needed before that happens.
Luis