On 31 May 2016 at 05:57, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> wrote:
This is a cleanup patch.
coresight_device->conns holds an array to point to the devices
connected to the OUT ports of a component. Sinks, e.g ETR, do not
have an OUT port (nr_outport = 0), as it streams the trace to
memory via AXI.
At coresight_register() we do :
conns = kcalloc(csdev->nr_outport, sizeof(*conns), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!conns) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_kzalloc_conns;
}
For ETR, since the total size requested for kcalloc is zero, the return value is,
ZERO_SIZE_PTR ( != NULL). Hence, csdev->conns = ZERO_SIZE_PTR which cannot be
verified later to contain a valid pointer. The code which accesses the csdev->conns
is bounded by the csdev->nr_outport check, hence we don't try to dereference the
ZERO_SIZE_PTR. This patch cleans up the csdev->conns and csdev->refcnt, initialisation
to make sure we initialise it properly(i.e, either NULL or valid conns array).
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c
index 0fdaaf4..8410420 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ struct coresight_device *coresight_register(struct coresight_desc *desc)
int nr_refcnts = 1;
atomic_t *refcnts = NULL;
struct coresight_device *csdev;
- struct coresight_connection *conns;
+ struct coresight_connection *conns = NULL;
csdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*csdev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!csdev) {
@@ -908,29 +908,35 @@ struct coresight_device *coresight_register(struct coresight_desc *desc)
nr_refcnts = desc->pdata->nr_outport;
}
- refcnts = kcalloc(nr_refcnts, sizeof(*refcnts), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!refcnts) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_kzalloc_refcnts;
- }
+ if (nr_refcnts) {
Did you manage to find a usecase where "nr_refcnts == 0" ? Since
components have at least one port this condition will always be true.
- csdev->conns = conns;
+ for (i = 0; i < csdev->nr_outport; i++) {
+ conns[i].outport = desc->pdata->outports[i];
+ conns[i].child_name = desc->pdata->child_names[i];
+ conns[i].child_port = desc->pdata->child_ports[i];
+ }
+
+ csdev->conns = conns;
The purpose of your patch is to correctly initialise csdev->conns to
NULL if there is no output port to speak of. As such shouldn't the
above statement be out of the if (csdev->nr_outport) {} ?.
I'm also getting a couple of checkpatch.pl warnings on this patch.