Re: [PATCH] lib/uuid.c: eliminate uuid_[bl]e_index arrays

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 14:36 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 16:31 -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> > Here's a patch implementing the suggestion I made earlier.ÂÂThis
> > reduces
> > code size, data size, and run time for input and output of UUIDs.
> []
> > diff --git a/lib/uuid.c b/lib/uuid.c
> []
> > @@ -97,32 +97,28 @@ bool uuid_is_valid(const char *uuid)
> > Â}
> > ÂEXPORT_SYMBOL(uuid_is_valid);
> > Â
> > -static int __uuid_to_bin(const char *uuid, __u8 b[16], const u8
> > ei[16])
> > +static int __uuid_to_bin(const char uuid[36], __u8 b[16], const u8
> > si[16])
> 
> Functions with sized array arguments are generally undesired.

That function follows existing UUID API. Since we have now it
consolidated in one place someone may fix it eventually.

Refer to this discussion as well:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-efi/msg08105.html

> 
> Linus once wrote: (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/203140
> 0)
> 
> ÂÂÂÂarray arguments in C don't
> ÂÂÂÂactually exist. Sadly, compilers accept it for various bad
> historical
> ÂÂÂÂreasons, and silently turn it into just a pointer argument. There
> are
> ÂÂÂÂarguments for them, but they are from weak minds.
> 
> Perhaps this would be better using simple pointers and without the __
> 
> static int __uuid_to_bin(const char *uuid, u8 *b, const u8 *si)
> 

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy