Re: [PATCH 04/17] arm: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT
From: Michal Hocko
Date: Thu Jun 02 2016 - 02:32:38 EST
On Wed 01-06-16 17:24:24, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:14:46AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> > __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
> > around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.
> > PGALLOC_GFP uses __GFP_REPEAT but none of the allocation which uses
> > this flag is for more than order-2. This means that this flag has never
> > been actually useful here because it has always been used only for
> > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests.
> I hear what you say, but...
> commit 8c65da6dc89ccb605d73773b1dd617e72982d971
> Author: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat Nov 30 12:52:31 2013 +0000
> ARM: pgd allocation: retry on failure
> Make pgd allocation retry on failure; we really need this to succeed
> otherwise fork() can trigger OOMs.
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> and that's the change which introduced this, and it did solve a problem
> for me. So I'm not happy to give an ack for this change unless someone
> can tell me why adding __GFP_REPEAT back then had a beneficial effect.
> Maybe there was some other bug in the MM layer in 2013 which this change
> happened to solve?
This is hard to tell but from the code snippet I have referenced it
should be pretty clear that the low order really had a nofail semantic.
git grep GFP_REPEAT 8c65da6dc89ccb605d73773b1dd617e72982d971 -- mm
confirms the story.
Do you remember your reproducer?