Re: [PATCH] tracing: Add *iter check for NULL

From: Namhyung Kim
Date: Thu Jun 02 2016 - 11:43:51 EST


Hello,

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:31 PM, <zhengjun.xing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: xingzhen <zhengjun.xing@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> 3debb0a9ddb adding a "__used" to the variable in the
> __trace_printk_fmt section. Sometimes it will cause
> *iter to be NULL, then strcmp in lookup_format and
> strcpy in hold_module_trace_bprintk_format will panic.
>
> Signed-off-by: xingzhen <zhengjun.xing@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Namhyung


> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_printk.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c b/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
> index f96f038..82ecfb5 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ void hold_module_trace_bprintk_format(const char **start, const char **end)
>
> mutex_lock(&btrace_mutex);
> for (iter = start; iter < end; iter++) {
> + if (!*iter)
> + goto err;
> struct trace_bprintk_fmt *tb_fmt = lookup_format(*iter);
> if (tb_fmt) {
> *iter = tb_fmt->fmt;
> @@ -75,6 +77,7 @@ void hold_module_trace_bprintk_format(const char **start, const char **end)
> *iter = fmt;
>
> }
> +err:
> mutex_unlock(&btrace_mutex);
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>