Re: [PATCH] of: use pr_fmt prefix for all console printing
From: Frank Rowand
Date: Thu Jun 02 2016 - 13:33:26 EST
On 06/02/16 08:14, Rob Herring wrote:
> Clean-up all the DT printk functions to use common pr_fmt prefix.
>
> Some print statements such as kmalloc errors were redundant, so just
> drop those.
>
> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/of/address.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> drivers/of/base.c | 11 ++++++----
> drivers/of/dynamic.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> drivers/of/fdt.c | 12 +++++------
> drivers/of/fdt_address.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/of/irq.c | 2 ++
> drivers/of/of_numa.c | 22 ++++++--------------
> drivers/of/of_pci.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 22 ++++++++++----------
> drivers/of/overlay.c | 43 +++++++++++++++-----------------------
> drivers/of/platform.c | 16 +++++++--------
> drivers/of/resolver.c | 2 ++
> 12 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-)
>
Nice cleanup. A couple of comments below.
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
< snip >
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
> index 0f2784b..e5764c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
> * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> */
>
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "OF: " fmt
> +
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/nodemask.h>
> @@ -65,11 +67,7 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
> u32 nid;
> int r = 0;
>
> - for (;;) {
> - np = of_find_node_by_type(np, "memory");
> - if (!np)
> - break;
> -
> + for_each_node_by_type(np, "memory") {
> r = of_property_read_u32(np, "numa-node-id", &nid);
> if (r == -EINVAL)
> /*
> @@ -83,18 +81,10 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
> break;
>
> r = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &rsrc);
> - if (r) {
> - pr_err("NUMA: bad reg property in memory node\n");
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - pr_debug("NUMA: base = %llx len = %llx, node = %u\n",
> - rsrc.start, rsrc.end - rsrc.start + 1, nid);
> -
> - r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start,
Missing declaration: int i;
Calling of_address_to_resource() with index > 0 and then calling
numa_add_memblk() with the resulting resource(s) is a change in
functionality. This should be in a separate patch.
> + for (i = 0; !r; i++, r = of_address_to_resource(np, i, &rsrc)) {
> + r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start,
> rsrc.end - rsrc.start + 1);
> - if (r)
> - break;
> + }
> }
> of_node_put(np);
>
< snip >
> diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c
> index 8225081..318dbb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c
> @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@
> * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> * version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> */
> -#undef DEBUG
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "OF: overlay: " fmt
> +
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -137,8 +139,8 @@ static int of_overlay_apply_one(struct of_overlay *ov,
> for_each_property_of_node(overlay, prop) {
> ret = of_overlay_apply_single_property(ov, target, prop);
> if (ret) {
> - pr_err("%s: Failed to apply prop @%s/%s\n",
> - __func__, target->full_name, prop->name);
> + pr_err("Failed to apply prop @%s/%s\n",
> + target->full_name, prop->name);
> return ret;
> }
> }
> @@ -146,9 +148,8 @@ static int of_overlay_apply_one(struct of_overlay *ov,
> for_each_child_of_node(overlay, child) {
> ret = of_overlay_apply_single_device_node(ov, target, child);
> if (ret != 0) {
> - pr_err("%s: Failed to apply single node @%s/%s\n",
> - __func__, target->full_name,
> - child->name);
> + pr_err("Failed to apply single node @%s/%s\n",
> + target->full_name, child->name);
> of_node_put(child);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -176,8 +177,7 @@ static int of_overlay_apply(struct of_overlay *ov)
>
> err = of_overlay_apply_one(ov, ovinfo->target, ovinfo->overlay);
> if (err != 0) {
> - pr_err("%s: overlay failed '%s'\n",
> - __func__, ovinfo->target->full_name);
> + pr_err("apply failed '%s'\n", ovinfo->target->full_name);
> return err;
> }
> }
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static struct device_node *find_target_node(struct device_node *info_node)
> if (ret == 0)
> return of_find_node_by_path(path);
>
> - pr_err("%s: Failed to find target for node %p (%s)\n", __func__,
> + pr_err("Failed to find target for node %p (%s)\n",
> info_node, info_node->name);
>
> return NULL;
> @@ -355,8 +355,6 @@ int of_overlay_create(struct device_node *tree)
>
> id = idr_alloc(&ov_idr, ov, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (id < 0) {
> - pr_err("%s: idr_alloc() failed for tree@%s\n",
> - __func__, tree->full_name);
Every other error in of_overlay_create() results in a pr_err().
(The other cases of removing pr_err() in this file are fine, because
the errors are already reported in the functions called from this
function.)
I would recommend leaving in the pr_err() for idr_alloc() failure.
> err = id;
> goto err_destroy_trans;
> }
> @@ -365,26 +363,21 @@ int of_overlay_create(struct device_node *tree)
> /* build the overlay info structures */
> err = of_build_overlay_info(ov, tree);
> if (err) {
> - pr_err("%s: of_build_overlay_info() failed for tree@%s\n",
> - __func__, tree->full_name);
> + pr_err("of_build_overlay_info() failed for tree@%s\n",
> + tree->full_name);
> goto err_free_idr;
> }
>
> /* apply the overlay */
> err = of_overlay_apply(ov);
> - if (err) {
> - pr_err("%s: of_overlay_apply() failed for tree@%s\n",
> - __func__, tree->full_name);
> + if (err)
> goto err_abort_trans;
> - }
>
> /* apply the changeset */
> err = __of_changeset_apply(&ov->cset);
> - if (err) {
> - pr_err("%s: __of_changeset_apply() failed for tree@%s\n",
> - __func__, tree->full_name);
> + if (err)
> goto err_revert_overlay;
> - }
> +
>
> /* add to the tail of the overlay list */
> list_add_tail(&ov->node, &ov_list);
> @@ -469,8 +462,7 @@ static int overlay_removal_is_ok(struct of_overlay *ov)
>
> list_for_each_entry(ce, &ov->cset.entries, node) {
> if (!overlay_is_topmost(ov, ce->np)) {
> - pr_err("%s: overlay #%d is not topmost\n",
> - __func__, ov->id);
> + pr_err("overlay #%d is not topmost\n", ov->id);
> return 0;
> }
> }
> @@ -496,16 +488,13 @@ int of_overlay_destroy(int id)
> ov = idr_find(&ov_idr, id);
> if (ov == NULL) {
> err = -ENODEV;
> - pr_err("%s: Could not find overlay #%d\n",
> - __func__, id);
> + pr_err("destroy: Could not find overlay #%d\n", id);
> goto out;
> }
>
> /* check whether the overlay is safe to remove */
> if (!overlay_removal_is_ok(ov)) {
> err = -EBUSY;
> - pr_err("%s: removal check failed for overlay #%d\n",
> - __func__, id);
> goto out;
> }
>
< snip >