Re: [PATCH 2/2] crypto : async implementation for sha1-mb

From: Herbert Xu
Date: Thu Jun 02 2016 - 20:33:32 EST


On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:20:20AM -0700, Megha Dey wrote:
>
> > > @@ -439,17 +444,18 @@ static int mcryptd_hash_finup_enqueue(struct ahash_request *req)
> > > static void mcryptd_hash_digest(struct crypto_async_request *req_async, int err)
> > > {
> > > struct mcryptd_hash_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req_async->tfm);
> > > - struct crypto_shash *child = ctx->child;
> > > + struct crypto_ahash *child = ctx->child;
> > > struct ahash_request *req = ahash_request_cast(req_async);
> > > struct mcryptd_hash_request_ctx *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(req);
> > > - struct shash_desc *desc = &rctx->desc;
> > > + struct ahash_request *desc = &rctx->areq;
> > > + struct crypto_async_request *base = &desc->base;
> > >
> > > if (unlikely(err == -EINPROGRESS))
> > > goto out;
> > > + base->tfm = &child->base;
> > > + base->flags = CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP; /* check this again */
> >
> > You should not be touching crypto_async_request directly. Use
> > the proper ahash interface to set the child request.
> >
> Herbert, Could you please clarify?
> In the earlier code we had a async_request which is now replaced by
> crypto_async_request. Do you want a new async_request to be used?
> Do you think we shouldn't be setting the members of the
> crypto_ahash_request directly, but use some other interface to do the
> same for us?

You already have an ahash_request here. So you should be doing

ahash_request_set_tfm(...)
ahash_request_set_callback(...)

Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt