RE: [PATCH 2/2] aer: add support aer interrupt with none MSI/MSI-X/INTx mode
From: Po Liu
Date: Wed Jun 08 2016 - 01:11:29 EST
Hi Bjorn,
Thanks for the kindly reply. All these are helpful.
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx]
> On Wed, June 08, 2016 6:47 AM
>
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:07:40AM +0000, Po Liu wrote:
> > Hi Bjorn,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:01:44AM -0400, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> > > > On 06/06/2016 03:32 AM, Po Liu wrote:
> > > > > Hi Bjorn,
> > > > > I confirm we met same problem with KeyStone base on DesignWare
> > > design.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Liu Po
> > > > >
> > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent:
> > > Saturday, June 04, 2016 11:49 AM > >> To: Murali Karicheri > >>
> > > Cc: Po Liu; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > >>
> > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >>
> > > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Arnd Bergmann; Roy Zang; Marc Zyngier;
> > > > >> Stuart Yoder; Yang-Leo Li; Minghuan Lian; Bjorn Helgaas; Shawn
> > > Guo; > >> Mingkai Hu; Rob Herring > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2]
> > > aer: add support aer interrupt with none > >> MSI/MSI-X/INTx mode
> > > > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:31:11PM -0400, Murali
> > > Karicheri wrote:
> > > > >> > Po,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Sorry to hijack your discussion, but the problem seems to
> > > be > >> same for > Keystone PCI controller which is also
> > > designware (old
> > > version) based.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On 06/03/2016 12:09 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > >> > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:37:28AM -0400, Murali
> > > Karicheri
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >> On 06/02/2016 09:55 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > >> > >>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 05:01:19AM +0000, Po Liu wrote:
> > > > >> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Bjorn
> > > Helgaas > >> [mailto:helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx] > >>>>> Sent: Thursday,
> > > June 02, 2016 > >> 11:48 AM > >>>>> To: Po Liu > >>>>> Cc:
> > > > >> linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >>>>> > >>
> > > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > >> > >>>>> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> Arnd > >>>>> Bergmann; Roy Zang;
> > > Marc Zyngier; Stuart Yoder; > >> Yang-Leo Li; > >>>>> Minghuan
> > > Lian; Bjorn Helgaas; Shawn Guo; > >> Mingkai Hu; Rob > >>>>>
> > > Herring > >>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] > >> aer: add support
> > > aer interrupt with > >>>>> none MSI/MSI-X/INTx > >> mode > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> [+cc Rob] > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Po, > > >> >>>>> > >>>>>
> > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 02:00:06PM +0800, Po Liu > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > >>>>> > On some platforms, root port doesn't support > >>
> > > MSI/MSI-X/INTx in RC mode.
> > > > >> > >>>>> > When chip support the aer interrupt with none >
> > > >> MSI/MSI-X/INTx > >>>>> mode, > maybe there is interrupt line
> > > for > >> aer pme etc. Search > >>>>> the interrupt > number in
> > > the fdt file.
> > > > >> > >>>>>
> > > > >> > >>>>> My understanding is that AER interrupt signaling can
> > > be > >> done > >>>>> via INTx, MSI, or MSI-X (PCIe spec r3.0, sec
> > > 6.2.4.1.2).
> > > > >> > >>>>> Apparently your device doesn't support MSI or MSI-X.
> > > Are > >> you > >>>>> saying it doesn't support INTx either? How
> > > is the > >> interrupt you're requesting here different from INTx?
> > > > >> > >>>>
> > > > >> > >>>> Layerscape use none of MSI or MSI-X or INTx to
> > > indicate the > >> > >>>> devices or root error in RC mode. But use
> > > an independent SPI > >> > >>>> interrupt(arm interrupt controller)
> line.
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> The Root Port is a PCI device and should follow the
> > > normal > >> PCI > >>> rules for interrupts. As far as I
> > > understand, that > >> means it > >>> should use MSI, MSI-X, or
> > > INTx. If your Root Port > >> doesn't use MSI > >>> or MSI-X, it
> > > should use INTx, the > >> PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN register > >>> should
> > > tell us which (INTA/ > >> INTB/etc.), and PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE
> should work to disable it.
> > > > >> > >>> That's all from the PCI point of view, of course.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> I am faced with the same issue on Keystone PCI hardware
> > > and > >> it has > >> been on my TODO list for quite some time.
> > > Keystone > >> PCI hardware > >> also doesn't use MSI or MSI-X or
> > > INTx for > >> reporting errors received > >> at the root port, but
> > > use a > >> platform interrupt instead (not > >> complaint to PCI
> > > standard as > >> per PCI base spec). So I would need > >> similar
> > > change to have > >> the error interrupt passed to the aer > >>
> > > driver. So there are > >> hardware out there like Keystone which
> > > requires to support this through platform IRQ.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > This is not a new area of the spec, and it's hard for me
> > > to > >> believe > > that these two new PCIe controllers are both
> > > broken > >> the same way > > (although I guess both are
> > > DesignWare-based, so > >> maybe this is the > > same underlying
> > > problem in both cases?). I > >> think it's more likely > > that
> > > we just haven't figured out the > >> right way to describe this in
> the DT.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Keystone is using an older version of the designware IP and
> > > it > >> > implements all of the interrupts in the application
> > > register > >> space > unlike other newer version of the hardware.
> > > So I assume, > >> the version > used on Layerscape is also an
> > > older version and the > >> both have same > issue in terms of non
> > > standard platform interrupt > >> used for error reporting.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > I assume you have a Root Port with an AER capability, no
> > > MSI > >> > > capability, and no MSI-X capability, right?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Has AER capability and both MSI and INTx (legacy)
> > > capability > > >> > > What does its Interrupt > > Pin register
> > > contain? If it's > >> zero, it doesn't use INTx either, so > >
> > > according to the spec it > >> should generate no interrupts.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > At address offset 0x3C by default has a value of 1, but it
> > > is > >> writable > by software. So default is INTx A.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 0x3c is the Interrupt *Line*, which is read/write. The
> > > Interrupt > >> *Pin* is at 0x3d and should be read-only.
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > > You are right. But default is 1 at this address.
> > > >
> > > > >> Does your Keystone driver support MSI? If so, since your
> > > Root > >> Port supports MSI, I would think we would use that by
> > > default, and > >> the INTx stuff wouldn't even matter.
> > > > >
> > > > > Layerscape is also shows "Both message signaled interrupts
> > > (MSI) and legacy INTx are supported."
> > > > > But both of them not work for AER interrupt when devices or
> > > root port report aer error.
> > > > > But another GIC interrupt line do.
> > > >
> > > > Same with Keystone. Even though both MSI and INTx are supported
> > > error > interrupt at root port is reported on a different interrupt
> > > line than > MSI/INTx. So for Power Management event interrupt is
> > > also different > line.
> > >
> > > I'm looking at the "Error Message Controls" diagram in the PCIe
> > > spec r3.0, sec 6.2.6. Does this hardware fit into the
> > > platform-specific "System Error" case there? Do the Root Control
> > > enable bits (in the PCIe
> > > Capability) control this interrupt? If so, maybe this makes more
> > > sense than I thought.
> >
> > It supposedly not the "System Error" case. But "the Error Interrupt"
> case.
> > Which means " Root Error Command register " could control the
> > interrupt line we have now. (refer PCIe spec r3.0, sec 6.2.6)
>
> Did you actually try this out and verify that the PCIe Root Control
> enable bits have no effect and the AER Root Error Command bits do
> control it? The names are very similar, so there's lots of room for
> misunderstanding here :)
Yes, all these result were tested before reply.
>
> If the AER Root Error Command does control this interrupt, I think the
> PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE bit in the PCI Command register should also
> control it (per sec 6.2.4.1.2).
Yes, I am sure the PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE bit can also control this interrupt.
>
> > May this kind of hardware design route broken the spec?
>
> If the Reporting Enable bits in the Root Port's AER Root Error Command
> register control the interrupt, but the interrupt is not delivered via
> the Root Port's INTx or MSI/MSI-X, I think the design is not following
> the spec.
>
> All the information needed by the AER driver should be communicated via
> the config space mechanisms described in the spec (AER capability,
> MSI/MSI-X capabilities, Interrupt Pin, etc.) That way the driver works
> without change on future spec-compliant hardware.
>
> > PME also like the AER. Hotplug is not supported. Others not known.
> > Po Liu
>
> Per sec 6.1.6, I think PME *should* be signaled by the Root Port's INTx
> or MSI/MSI-X.
>
> In particular, it says "Note that all other interrupt sources within the
> same Function will assert the same virtual INTx wire when requesting
> service." To me, that means that if we're using INTx, it will be the
> same INTx for AER, PME, hotplug, etc., and it should be the one
> indicated by the Interrupt Pin register.
>
> But I think on your Root Port:
>
> - There is an MSI capability, but MSI doesn't actually work at all
> - Interrupt Pin contains 1, indicating INTA, which is routed to IRQ X
> - AER interrupts are routed to some different IRQ Y
> - PME interrupts are routed to a third IRQ Z
>
The descriptions are all right.
> So how should we work around this? I think you should be able to get
> partway there with a quirk that sets:
>
> dev->no_msi = 1;
> dev->irq = Y;
>
> for this device. That should make AER work, but of course PME would not
> work.
>
> Is there a way to set up your interrupt controller so these three
> interrupts (X, Y, Z above) all map to the same Linux IRQ? If you can do
> that, you could set up INTA, the AER interrupt, and the PME interrupt to
> all be on the same IRQ and everything should work.
>
> Bjorn
We'll think about all the ways. It is really helpful, thanks!