[PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 183/206] powerpc/sstep: Fix sstep.c compile on powerpcspe

[Kamal Mostafa]

4.2.8-ckt12 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit dd21731022faf43c1250050e5d28d11add599149 upstream.

Commit be96f63375a1 ("powerpc: Split out instruction analysis part of
emulate_step()") introduced ldarx and stdcx into the instructions in
sstep.c, which are not accepted by the assembler on powerpcspe, but does
seem to be accepted by the normal powerpc assembler even in 32 bit mode.

Wrap these two instructions in a __powerpc64__ check like it is
everywhere else in the file.

Fixes: be96f63375a1 ("powerpc: Split out instruction analysis part of emulate_step()")
Signed-off-by: Len Sorensen <lsorense@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
index dc885b3..6d34310 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/sstep.c
@@ -1818,9 +1818,11 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
 		case 4:
 			__get_user_asmx(val, op.ea, err, "lwarx");
 			break;
+#ifdef __powerpc64__
 		case 8:
 			__get_user_asmx(val, op.ea, err, "ldarx");
 			break;
+#endif
 		default:
 			return 0;
 		}
@@ -1841,9 +1843,11 @@ int __kprobes emulate_step(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr)
 		case 4:
 			__put_user_asmx(op.val, op.ea, err, "stwcx.", cr);
 			break;
+#ifdef __powerpc64__
 		case 8:
 			__put_user_asmx(op.val, op.ea, err, "stdcx.", cr);
 			break;
+#endif
 		default:
 			return 0;
 		}
-- 
2.7.4