Re: [PATCH 10/11] phy: rockchip-emmc: Minor code cleanup in rockchip_emmc_phy_power_off()

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2016/6/8 6:44, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>>
>> There's no reason to store the return value of rockchip_emmc_phy_power()
>> in a variable nor to check it.  Just return it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 8 +-------
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
>> b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
>> index 0fce7359d468..188e4c387ba8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
>> @@ -227,8 +227,6 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power_off(struct phy
>> *phy)
>>  static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>>  {
>
>
> I saw the cleanup for power_off is done on [patch 9/11]
>
> shouldn't be in this patch? :)

Yeah, I tried to, but then I realized that I couldn't split that out
too easily because the previous patch touched the same code.

...but actually, reordering things solves all the problems so I've done that.


-Doug