Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 10/13] spi: sunxi: merge sun4i and sun6i SPI driver

[Julian Calaby]

Hi Michal,

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The drivers are very similar and share multiple flaws which needed
> separate fixes for both drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/Kconfig     |   8 +-
>  drivers/spi/Makefile    |   1 -
>  drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c | 156 +++++++++++--
>  drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c | 598 ------------------------------------------------
>  4 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 620 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 drivers/spi/spi-sun6i.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c
> index 0b8e6c6..c76f8e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c
> @@ -279,9 +321,14 @@ static int sunxi_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
>         reg = sunxi_spi_read(sspi, SUNXI_TFR_CTL_REG);
>
>         /* Reset FIFOs */
> -       sunxi_spi_write(sspi, SUNXI_TFR_CTL_REG,
> -                       reg | sspi_bits(sspi, SUNXI_CTL_RF_RST) |
> -                       sspi_bits(sspi, SUNXI_CTL_TF_RST));
> +       if (sspi->type == SPI_SUN4I)
> +               sunxi_spi_write(sspi, SUNXI_TFR_CTL_REG,
> +                               reg | sspi_bits(sspi, SUNXI_CTL_RF_RST) |
> +                               sspi_bits(sspi, SUNXI_CTL_TF_RST));
> +       else
> +               sunxi_spi_write(sspi, SUNXI_FIFO_CTL_REG,
> +                               sspi_bits(sspi, SUNXI_CTL_RF_RST) |
> +                               sspi_bits(sspi, SUNXI_CTL_TF_RST));

If we're already doing different stuff for each generation of the IP,
why not just use the register offsets and bit definitions directly?

>
>         /*
>          * Setup the transfer control register: Chip Select,
> @@ -427,7 +473,19 @@ static int sunxi_spi_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>                 goto err;
>         }
>
> -       sunxi_spi_write(sspi, SUNXI_TFR_CTL_REG,
> +       if (sspi->rstc) {
> +               ret = reset_control_deassert(sspi->rstc);
> +               if (ret) {
> +                       dev_err(dev, "Couldn't deassert the device from reset\n");
> +                       goto err2;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       if (sspi->type == SPI_SUN4I)
> +               reg = SUNXI_TFR_CTL_REG;
> +       else
> +               reg = SUNXI_GBL_CTL_REG;
> +       sunxi_spi_write(sspi, reg,
>                         sspi_bits(sspi, SUNXI_CTL_ENABLE) |
>                         sspi_bits(sspi, SUNXI_CTL_MASTER) |
>                         sspi_bits(sspi, SUNXI_CTL_TP));

Same here.

> @@ -491,10 +558,37 @@ static int sunxi_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         }
>
>         sspi->master = master;
> -       sspi->fifo_depth = SUN4I_FIFO_DEPTH;
> -       sspi->type = SPI_SUN4I;
> -       sspi->regmap = &sun4i_regmap;
> -       sspi->bitmap = &sun4i_bitmap;
> +       if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, SUN4I_COMPATIBLE)) {
> +               sspi->fifo_depth = SUN4I_FIFO_DEPTH;
> +               sspi->type = SPI_SUN4I;
> +               sspi->regmap = &sun4i_regmap;
> +               sspi->bitmap = &sun4i_bitmap;
> +       } else if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node,
> +                                          SUN6I_COMPATIBLE)) {
> +               sspi->fifo_depth = SUN6I_FIFO_DEPTH;
> +               sspi->type = SPI_SUN6I;
> +               sspi->regmap = &sun6i_regmap;
> +               sspi->bitmap = &sun6i_bitmap;

Can you store data in the match table instead of doing this?

> +       } else {
> +               const char *str = NULL;
> +               int i = 1;
> +
> +               of_property_read_string(pdev->dev.of_node, "compatible", &str);
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unknown device compatible %s", str);
> +               /* is there no sane way to print a string array property ? */
> +               if (of_property_count_strings(pdev->dev.of_node, "compatible")
> +                   > 1) {
> +                       while (!of_property_read_string_index(pdev->dev.of_node,
> +                                                             "compatible", i,
> +                                                             &str)) {
> +                               pr_err(", %s", str);
> +                               i++;
> +                       }
> +               }
> +               ret = -EINVAL;
> +               goto err_free_master;
> +       }
> +
>         master->max_speed_hz = 100 * 1000 * 1000;
>         master->min_speed_hz =          3 * 1000;
>         master->set_cs = sunxi_spi_set_cs;

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/