Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] skb_array: array based FIFO for skbs
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Date: Tue Jun 14 2016 - 07:57:11 EST
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:54:26 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Jesper, Jason, I know that both of you tested this,
> please post Tested-by tags for whatever was tested.
Yes, I tested this via "external" kernel modules, not your framework.
I have verified that this V8 patchset is equivalent, to what I have in:
https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/ (at 81ca09c2a945)
> changes since v7
> fix typos noticed by Jesper Brouer
You also fixed a missing _bh ... I verified you also included this fix ;-)
https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/commit/24da4f495bb
> changes since v6
> resize implemented. peek/full calls are no longer lockless
>
> replaced _FIELD macros with _CALL which invoke a function
> on the pointer rather than just returning a value
>
> destroy now scans the array and frees all queued skbs
>
> changes since v5
> implemented a generic ptr_ring api, and
> made skb_array a type-safe wrapper
> apis for taking the spinlock in different contexts
> following expected usecase in tun
Tested-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer