Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Tue Jun 14 2016 - 12:05:59 EST
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or
> > > > twice
> > > > in someÂ
> > > > documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't
> > > > like to
> > > > use PMCÂ
> > > > abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many other
> > > > variation ofÂ
> > > > existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms.
> > > >
> > > > PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power
> > > > Management
> > > > frameworkÂ
> > > > in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which
> > > > will
> > > > have its ownÂ
> > > > driver in the future, so, can't use it either.
> > > >
> > > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit)
> > > > â
> > > > one of them?
> > >
> > > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
> >
> > Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.
>
> Yeah, indeed - so pwr it is?
Yes. Will rename in this way, re-test and re-send.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy