Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] drm: rockchip: use common iommu api to attach iommu
From: Tomasz Figa
Date: Wed Jun 15 2016 - 10:24:56 EST
Hi Shunqian,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rockchip DRM used the arm special API, arm_iommu_*(), to attach
> iommu for ARM32 SoCs. This patch convert to common iommu API
> so it would support ARM64 like RK3399.
>
> The general idea is domain_alloc(), attach_device() and
> arch_setup_dma_ops() to set dma_ops manually for DRM at the last.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
Please see my comment inline.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> index f5a68fc..b52c38d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> @@ -14,16 +14,16 @@
> * GNU General Public License for more details.
> */
>
> -#include <asm/dma-iommu.h>
> -
> #include <drm/drmP.h>
> #include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
> #include <drm/drm_fb_helper.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-iommu.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_graph.h>
> #include <linux/component.h>
> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
>
> #include "rockchip_drm_drv.h"
> #include "rockchip_drm_fb.h"
> @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ static bool is_support_iommu = true;
> int rockchip_drm_dma_attach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
> struct device *dev)
> {
> - struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping = drm_dev->dev->archdata.mapping;
> + struct rockchip_drm_private *private = drm_dev->dev_private;
> + struct iommu_domain *domain = private->domain;
> int ret;
>
> if (!is_support_iommu)
> @@ -58,16 +59,25 @@ int rockchip_drm_dma_attach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>
> dma_set_max_seg_size(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>
> - return arm_iommu_attach_device(dev, mapping);
> + ret = iommu_attach_device(domain, dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to attach iommu device\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* TODO(djkurtz): fetch the mapping start/size from somewhere */
> + arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0x00000000, SZ_2G, dev->bus->iommu_ops, false);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> void rockchip_drm_dma_detach_device(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
> struct device *dev)
> {
> - if (!is_support_iommu)
> - return;
> + struct rockchip_drm_private *private = drm_dev->dev_private;
> + struct iommu_domain *domain = private->domain;
>
> - arm_iommu_detach_device(dev);
> + if (is_support_iommu)
> + iommu_detach_device(domain, dev);
> }
>
> int rockchip_register_crtc_funcs(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> @@ -132,10 +142,52 @@ static void rockchip_drm_crtc_disable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev,
> priv->crtc_funcs[pipe]->disable_vblank(crtc);
> }
>
> +static int rockchip_drm_init_iommu(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
> +{
> + struct rockchip_drm_private *private = drm_dev->dev_private;
> + struct device *dev = drm_dev->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dev->dma_parms = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dev->dma_parms),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dev->dma_parms)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + private->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(&platform_bus_type);
> + if (!private->domain)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* TODO(djkurtz): fetch the mapping start/size from somewhere */
> + ret = iommu_dma_init_domain(private->domain, 0x00000000, SZ_2G);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to init domain\n");
> + goto err_free_domain;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rockchip_drm_dma_attach_device(drm_dev, dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to attach device\n");
> + goto err_free_domain;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_free_domain:
> + iommu_domain_free(private->domain);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void rockchip_iommu_cleanup(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
> +{
> + struct rockchip_drm_private *private = drm_dev->dev_private;
> +
No need to call rockchip_drm_dma_detach_device() here?
> + iommu_domain_free(private->domain);
> +}
Otherwise looks good, so after addressing the above, feel free to add
my Reviewed-by.
Best regards,
Tomasz