Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?"

[Cornelia Huck]

On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:30:34 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 06/16/2016 12:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 13/06/2016 16:44, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>>>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 10 +++++-----
> >>>>  arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig     |  1 -
> >>>>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c       | 11 +++--------
> >>>>  include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++------
> >>>>  virt/kvm/Kconfig         |  3 ---
> >>>>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> >>>>  6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >> Looks like a sane approach, only two inversions in the s390 patch :)
> > 
> > So it's okay to push patch 3 to kvm/next?
> 
> 
> With the 2 fixes that Conny requested, yes.

I had been waiting for a v2 ;)

> 
> With that fixed up, 
> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 

In that case, you can also add my

Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>

to the s390 patch.