RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] pci/aer: interrupt fixup in the quirk
From: Po Liu
Date: Thu Jun 16 2016 - 23:31:22 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 9:54 PM
> To: Po Liu
> Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Bjorn Helgaas;
> Shawn Guo; Marc Zyngier; Rob Herring; Roy Zang; Mingkai Hu; Stuart Yoder;
> Yang-Leo Li; Arnd Bergmann; Minghuan Lian; Murali Karicheri
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pci/aer: interrupt fixup in the quirk
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:12:27PM +0800, Po Liu wrote:
> > On some platforms, root port doesn't support MSI/MSI-X/INTx in RC mode.
> > When chip support the aer interrupt with none MSI/MSI-X/INTx mode,
> > maybe there is interrupt line for aer pme etc. Search the interrupt
> > number in the fdt file. Then fixup the dev->irq with it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Po Liu <po.liu@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > changes for V2:
> > - Move to the quirk file
> >
> > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c index
> > ee72ebe..909d479 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>
> Is there any possibility of this part being used on different arches, or
> will it only ever be on arm64 (or whatever it is)? If the latter, it
> could go somewhere like arch/arm64/kernel/quirks.c (which doesn't exist
> yet).
NXP Layerscape1 is base on the arm 32bit design. Also need the fixup.
>
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > #include <linux/ktime.h>
> > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > #include <asm/dma.h> /* isa_dma_bridge_buggy */
> > #include "pci.h"
> >
> > @@ -4419,3 +4420,25 @@ static void quirk_intel_qat_vf_cap(struct
> pci_dev *pdev)
> > }
> > }
> > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x443,
> > quirk_intel_qat_vf_cap);
> > +
> > +/* If root port doesn't support MSI/MSI-X/INTx in RC mode,
> > + * but use standalone irq. Read the device tree for the aer
> > + * interrupt number.
> > + */
> > +static void quirk_aer_interrupt(struct pci_dev *dev) {
> > + int ret;
> > + struct device_node *np = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (dev->bus->dev.of_node)
> > + np = dev->bus->dev.of_node;
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_IRQ) && np) {
> > + ret = of_irq_get_byname(np, "aer");
> > + if (ret > 0) {
> > + dev->no_msi = 1;
> > + dev->irq = ret;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> What does this mean for the other PCIe services, e.g., PME? I guess
> this makes the existing AER code work unchanged. But I thought PME had
> a similar situation and was connected up to a different interrupt than
> AER was.
Yes, PME is similar, HP is not support. I think better to disable the PME service irq in the quirk.
But seems it is no use because quirk fixup is only running in init phase time(except suspend, resume).
>
> > +}
> > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, PCI_ANY_ID,
> > +quirk_aer_interrupt);
> > --
> > 2.1.0.27.g96db324
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci"
> > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo
> > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html