Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] max8903: adds requesting of gpios.
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Fri Jun 17 2016 - 02:30:29 EST
On 06/17/2016 07:00 AM, Chris Lapa wrote:
> From: Chris Lapa <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This change ensures all gpios are available for the driver to use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Lapa <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/power/max8903_charger.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/max8903_charger.c b/drivers/power/max8903_charger.c
> index dbd911c4..c068efe 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/max8903_charger.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/max8903_charger.c
> @@ -212,6 +212,16 @@ static int max8903_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> if (pdata->dc_valid) {
> if (pdata->dok && gpio_is_valid(pdata->dok)) {
> + ret = devm_gpio_request(dev,
> + pdata->dok,
No need to split these two arguments. They fit in 80 chars.
> + data->psy_desc.name);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Failed GPIO request for dok: %d err %d\n",
> + pdata->dok, ret);
Indentation here is wrong. These should be aligned to first argument (dev).
> + return -EINVAL;
Return 'ret'.
All these three comments apply also to code below.
Anyway the probe function is getting bigger and more difficult to read.
Consider factoring out some code to a separate function. For example all
the GPIO handling stuff could be factored.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
> + }
> +
> gpio = pdata->dok; /* PULL_UPed Interrupt */
> ta_in = gpio_get_value(gpio) ? 0 : 1;
> } else {
> @@ -223,6 +233,16 @@ static int max8903_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> if (pdata->dcm) {
> if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->dcm)) {
> + ret = devm_gpio_request(dev,
> + pdata->dcm,
> + data->psy_desc.name);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Failed GPIO request for dcm: %d err %d\n",
> + pdata->dcm, ret);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> gpio = pdata->dcm; /* Output */
> gpio_set_value(gpio, ta_in);
> } else {
> @@ -233,6 +253,16 @@ static int max8903_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> if (pdata->usb_valid) {
> if (pdata->uok && gpio_is_valid(pdata->uok)) {
> + ret = devm_gpio_request(dev,
> + pdata->uok,
> + data->psy_desc.name);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Failed GPIO request for uok: %d err %d\n",
> + pdata->uok, ret);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> gpio = pdata->uok;
> usb_in = gpio_get_value(gpio) ? 0 : 1;
> } else {
> @@ -244,6 +274,16 @@ static int max8903_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> if (pdata->cen) {
> if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->cen)) {
> + ret = devm_gpio_request(dev,
> + pdata->cen,
> + data->psy_desc.name);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Failed GPIO request for cen: %d err %d\n",
> + pdata->cen, ret);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> gpio_set_value(pdata->cen, (ta_in || usb_in) ? 0 : 1);
> } else {
> dev_err(dev, "Invalid pin: cen.\n");
> @@ -252,23 +292,44 @@ static int max8903_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> if (pdata->chg) {
> - if (!gpio_is_valid(pdata->chg)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Invalid pin: chg.\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->chg)) {
> + ret = devm_gpio_request(dev,
> + pdata->chg,
> + data->psy_desc.name);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Failed GPIO request for chg: %d err %d\n",
> + pdata->chg, ret);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> if (pdata->flt) {
> - if (!gpio_is_valid(pdata->flt)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Invalid pin: flt.\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->flt)) {
> + ret = devm_gpio_request(dev,
> + pdata->flt,
> + data->psy_desc.name);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Failed GPIO request for flt: %d err %d\n",
> + pdata->flt, ret);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> if (pdata->usus) {
> - if (!gpio_is_valid(pdata->usus)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Invalid pin: usus.\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->usus)) {
> + ret = devm_gpio_request(dev,
> + pdata->usus,
> + data->psy_desc.name);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Failed GPIO request for usus: %d err %d\n",
> + pdata->usus, ret);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
> }
>
>