Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] ARM64/PCI: Start using quirks handling for ACPI based PCI host controller

From: Duc Dang
Date: Fri Jun 17 2016 - 17:37:36 EST


On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:34:11AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
>> From: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> pci_generic_ecam_ops is used by default. Since there are platforms
>> which have non-compliant ECAM space we need to overwrite these
>> accessors prior to PCI buses enumeration. In order to do that
>> we call pci_mcfg_get_ops to retrieve pci_ecam_ops structure so that
>> we can use proper PCI config space accessors and bus_shift.
>>
>> pci_generic_ecam_ops is still used for platforms free from quirks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> index 94cd43c..a891bda 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>> struct pci_config_window *cfg;
>> struct resource cfgres;
>> unsigned int bsz;
>> + struct pci_ecam_ops *ops;
>>
>> /* Use address from _CBA if present, otherwise lookup MCFG */
>> if (!root->mcfg_addr)
>> @@ -150,12 +151,12 @@ pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> - bsz = 1 << pci_generic_ecam_ops.bus_shift;
>> + ops = pci_mcfg_get_ops(root);
>> + bsz = 1 << ops->bus_shift;
>> cfgres.start = root->mcfg_addr + bus_res->start * bsz;
>> cfgres.end = cfgres.start + resource_size(bus_res) * bsz - 1;
>> cfgres.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
>> - cfg = pci_ecam_create(&root->device->dev, &cfgres, bus_res,
>> - &pci_generic_ecam_ops);
>> + cfg = pci_ecam_create(&root->device->dev, &cfgres, bus_res, ops);
>
> Arnd pointed this out already, I think that's the only pending question
> here.
>
> pci_ecam_create() maps ECAM space for config regions retrieved from
> the MCFG, which are *supposed* to be ECAM compliant.
>
> Do we think that's *always* correct/safe regardless of the kind
> of quirk we are currently fixing up ?
>
> Or we do think that configuration space regions should come from
> a different resource declared in the ACPI namespace if the regions
> are not MCFG/ECAM compliant (ie config space is not defined through
> MCFG at all - possibly through a _CRS method for a vendor specific
> _HID under the PNP0A03 node ?)

Hi Lorenzo,

For X-Gene: the ECAM space is used to access the configuration space of PCIe
devices, with additional help from controller register to specify the
bus, device and
function number. Below is the RFC patch that implements ECAM fixup for X-Gene
PCIe controller on top of this RFC ECAM quirk v3 for your and others reference.

---