Re: [PATCH] mm: fix account pmd page to the process
From: zhong jiang
Date: Sat Jun 18 2016 - 01:09:07 EST
On 2016/6/17 23:39, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 06/17/2016 05:25 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> From fd22922e7b4664e83653a84331f0a95b985bff0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:07:03 +0300
>> Subject: [PATCH] hugetlb: fix nr_pmds accounting with shared page tables
>>
>> We account HugeTLB's shared page table to all processes who share it.
>> The accounting happens during huge_pmd_share().
>>
>> If somebody populates pud entry under us, we should decrease pagetable's
>> refcount and decrease nr_pmds of the process.
>>
>> By mistake, I increase nr_pmds again in this case. :-/
>> It will lead to "BUG: non-zero nr_pmds on freeing mm: 2" on process'
>> exit.
>>
>> Let's fix this by increasing nr_pmds only when we're sure that the page
>> table will be used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Nice,
> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I agree that we do not necessarily need a back port. I have not seen
> reports of people experiencing this race and seeing the BUG (on mm
> tear-down).
>
> zhongjiang, did someone actually hit the BUG? Or, did you find it by
> code examination?
>
just code examination.