Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] max8903: cleans up confusing relationship between dc_valid, dok and dcm.

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/20/2016 12:27 AM, Chris Lapa wrote:
> From: Chris Lapa <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The max8903_charger.h file indicated that dcm and dok were not optional
> when dc_valid is set.
> 
> It makes sense to have dok as a compulsory pin when dc_valid is given.
> However dcm can be optionally wired to a fixed level especially when the
> circuit is configured for dc power exclusively.
> 
> The previous implementation already allowed for this somewhat, however no
> error was given if dok wasn't given whilst dc_valid was.
> 
> The new implementation enforces dok presence when dc_valid is given. Whilst
> allowing dcm to be optional.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Lapa <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>

BR.
Krzysztof