RE: [PATCH v3 1/3] pinctrl/broxton: enable platform device in the absent of ACPI enumeration

[Tan, Jui Nee]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:09 PM
> To: Tan, Jui Nee <jui.nee.tan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thomas Gleixner
> <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>; H. Peter Anvin
> <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; ptyser@xxxxxxxxxxx; Lee Jones
> <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Yong, Jonathan <jonathan.yong@xxxxxxxxx>; Yu,
> Ong Hock <ong.hock.yu@xxxxxxxxx>; Voon, Weifeng
> <weifeng.voon@xxxxxxxxx>; Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie
> <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] pinctrl/broxton: enable platform device in the
> absent of ACPI enumeration
> 
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Tan Jui Nee <jui.nee.tan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This is to cater the need for non-ACPI system whereby a platform
> > device has to be created in order to bind with the Apollo Lake Pinctrl
> > GPIO platform driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tan Jui Nee <jui.nee.tan@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> You forgot to put me on the To: line for the patch so it's only luck that I saw it.
> (Every once on a blue moon I read the linux-gpio list directly...)
> 
> Patch applied with Mika's ACK.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
Oh, I'm sorry. I will add your name in the subsequent patch/mail.