Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Tue Jun 21 2016 - 15:44:53 EST
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:37:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hurm.. So I've applied it, just to get this issue sorted, but I'm not
> entirely sure I like it.
>
> I think I prefer ego's version because that makes it harder to get stuff
> to run on !active,online cpus. I think we really want to be careful what
> gets to run during that state.
The original patch just did set_cpus_allowed one more time late enough
so that the target kthread (in most cases) doesn't have to go through
fallback rq selection afterwards. I don't know what the long term
solution is but CPU_ONLINE callbacks should be able to bind kthreads
to the new CPU one way or the other.
Thanks.
--
tejun