Re: [PATCH 21/27] [AARCH64] ILP32: introduce syscalls that pass off_t

[Joseph Myers]

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Yury Norov wrote:

> So for now I think it's simpler to have this ABI in sysdeps, and be in

Of course it goes in sysdeps.  But not architecture-specific sysdeps.  
And "simpler" for initial implementation may not be simpler for future 
maintenance; when there are too many implementations of a function, they 
have a tendency to get out of sync, and to cause trouble for future global 
changes.  There are two plausible options that I see:

* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/<some-descriptive-name>, where 
<some-descriptive-name> is an architecture-independent name for the 
relevant ABI feature.

* Have a macro __SOME_ABI_FEATURE in some sysdeps header, and then use 
conditionals on that macro in existing implementations in 
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic or sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux.

I think the second one is preferable.  If you prefer the first one, you 
should be able to justify it by giving some detailed examples of what the 
different implementations look like and why there is actually nothing 
useful in common between them that would allow shared implementations with 
conditional code.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx