Re: [LTP] [patch V2 00/20] timer: Refactor the timer wheel
From: Cyril Hrubis
Date: Thu Jun 23 2016 - 11:15:53 EST
Hi!
> Two points:
> 1) sigtimedwait() is unusual in that it uses the jiffies timer. Most
> system call timeouts (including specifically the one in FUTEX_WAIT)
> use the high-resolution timer subsystem, which is a whole different
> animal with tighter guarantees, and
That is likely POSIX conformance bug, since POSIX explicitly states that
sigtimedwait() shall use CLOCK_MONOTONIC to measure the timeout.
"If the Monotonic Clock option is supported, the CLOCK_MONOTONIC clock
shall be used to measure the time interval specified by the timeout
argument."
> 2) The worst-case error in tglx's proposal is 1/8 of the requested
> timeout: the wakeup is after 112.5% of the requested time, plus
> one tick. This is well within your requested accuracy. (For very
> short timeouts, the "plus one tick" can dominate the percentage error.)
Hmm, that still does not add up to the number in the original email
where it says time_elapsed: 1.197057. As far as I can tell the worst
case for a tick is CONFIG_HZ=100 so one tick is 0.01s and even after
that we get 118.7% since we requested 1s. But that may be caused by the
fact that the test uses gettimeofday() to measure the elapsed time, it
should use CLOCK_MONOTONIC instead.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@xxxxxxx