Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] Virtually mapped stacks with guard pages (x86, core)
From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Thu Jun 23 2016 - 15:09:28 EST
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Ugh. Looking around at this, it turns out that a great example of this
>> kind of legacy issue is the debug_mutex stuff.
>
> Interestingly, the *only* other user of ti->task for a full
> allmodconfig build of x86-64 seems to be
>
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
>
> with the print_context_stack() -> print_ftrace_graph_addr() -> task =
> tinfo->task chain.
>
> And that doesn't really seem to want thread_info either. The callers
> all have 'task', and have to generate thread_info from that anyway.
>
> So this attached patch (which includes the previous one) seems to
> build. I didn't actually boot it, but there should be no users left
> unless there is some asm code that has hardcoded offsets..
I think you'll break some architectures when you remove the
initialization of ti->task. That either needs to be pushed down into
arch code in unicore32, openrisc, microblaze, powerpx, xtensa, sparc,
parisc, arm, mips, s390, and whatever I missed, or you should leave
the field initialized and existing and wait for my patch to
conditionally remove/embed thread_info to get rid of the
initialization part.
On the C side, there's:
arm's contextidr_notifier (easily fixable)
sh's irqctx->tinfo.task = curctx->task; (probably useless) and
print_ftrace_graph_addr
cris's ugdb_trap_user (probably easily fixable)
sparc's arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace (possibly quite hard to fix)
sparc's flush_thread (trivial)
sparc's __save_stack_trace (not sure)
unicore's __die (probably easy)
metag's do_softirq_own_stack (not sure if it's useful)
I found these with this coccinelle script:
@@
struct thread_info *ti;
@@
* ti->task
$ spatch --sp-file titask.cocci --dir .