Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] hwmon: Add support for INA3221 Triple Current/Voltage Monitors

From: Andrew F. Davis
Date: Fri Jun 24 2016 - 13:32:05 EST


On 06/24/2016 11:46 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:02:51AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> On 06/18/2016 10:16 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> The chip registers are 16 bit. Can you repeat the command using the "w"
>>> option ?
>>>
>>
>> # i2cdump -y 2 0x40 w
>> 0,8 1,9 2,a 3,b 4,c 5,d 6,e 7,f
>> 00: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> 08: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> 10: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> 18: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> 20: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> 28: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> 30: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> 38: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> 40: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> 48: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> 50: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> 58: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> 60: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> 68: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> 70: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> 78: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> 80: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> 88: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> 90: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> 98: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> a0: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> a8: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> b0: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> b8: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> c0: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> c8: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> d0: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> d8: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>> e0: 2771 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f87f
>> e8: f87f f87f f87f f87f f87f 0000 fe7f 0300
>> f0: 1027 2823 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff
>> f8: ffff ffff XXXX f8f8 ffff ffff 4954 2032
>
> Thanks a lot!
>

Feel free to completely ignore the first register dump I sent, I did it
for the wrong device anyway :).

I had just gotten done reading this:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/10/459
and accidentally got EVMs confused did the test for the TMP461, but it
does look like on startup register 0x16 can be used to differentiate the
parts, if the TMP461 hadn't gone into a different driver.

Andrew