Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: of: allow instantiating slaves without a driver

From: Mark Brown
Date: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 08:57:48 EST


On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:53:31PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 26 June 2016 at 14:45, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > No, there's other things like figuring out which controller to bind to
> > that need to be taken into consideration.

> Why do you care? So long as you name the CS that is available on
> connector with the same pinout same on all boards you can target the
> slave regardless of the controller it's attached to.

That would be a binding for the connector which is the big missing bit
here - it's not clear that such a limited connector description would be
a good idea.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature