Re: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

[Lee Jones]

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:25:43 +0200
> 
> Several update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (6):
>   twl-core: Return directly after a failed platform_device_alloc()
>     in add_numbered_child()
>   twl-core: Refactoring for add_numbered_child()
>   dm355evm_msp: Return directly after a failed platform_device_alloc()
>     in add_child()
>   dm355evm_msp: Refactoring for add_child()
>   smsc-ece1099: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation
>     in smsc_i2c_probe()
>   smsc-ece1099: Return directly after a function failure
>     in smsc_i2c_probe()
> 
>  drivers/mfd/dm355evm_msp.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c | 11 ++++-------
>  drivers/mfd/twl-core.c     | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

What is this set?  A different but related one to the set you tagged
it on to?  Probably best not to do that.  I now have a huge entangled
thread in my inbox, which is going to become out of control rather
quickly (if it isn't already).

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog